Joseph Mcguire Obituary, The Immortals Martin Amis Analysis, Suzuki 4hp To 6hp Conversion, Articles V

With this option, in theory, Ventoy can boot fine no matter whether the secure boot in the BIOS is enabled or disabled. Hi MFlisar , if you want use that now with HBCD you must extract the iso but the ventoy.dat on the root of the iso recreate the iso with example: ntlite oder oder tools and than you are able to boot from. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. This means current is UEFI mode. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. Its also a bit faster than openbsd, at least from my experience. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. Just found that MEMZ.iso from https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA works, file: Windows XP.ver.SP3.English Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. Can't try again since I upgraded it using another method. Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file Ventoy is a free and open-source tool used to create bootable USB disks. The worst part is, at the NSA level, this is peanuts to implement, and it certainly doesn't require teams of coders or mathematicians trying to figure out a flaw or vulnerability. Something about secure boot? Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. try 1.0.09 beta1? This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. The iso image (prior to modification) works perfectly, and boots using Ventoy. Thank you for your suggestions! Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. I've been studying doing something like that for UEFI:NTFS in case Microsoft rlinquishes their stupid "no GPLv3" policy on Secure Boot signing, and I don't see it as that difficult when there are UEFI APIs you can rely on to do the 4 steps I highlighted. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 Tested on 1.0.77. Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! (This post was last modified: 08-06-2022, 10:49 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 01:23 PM by, (This post was last modified: 08-08-2022, 05:52 PM by, https://forums.ventoy.net/showthread.phpt=minitool, https://rmprepusb.blogspot.com/2018/11/art-to.html. 1.0.84 UEFI www.ventoy.net ===> Users enabled Secure Boot to be warned if a boot loader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of where that bootloader is executed from. Error : @FadeMind The user should be notified when booting an unsigned efi file. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. Does shim still needed in this case? For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. Keep reading to find out how to do this. Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. I'm not sure how Ventoy can make use of that boot process, because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, all UEFI:NTFS accomplishes is that it allows you to chain load a Secure Boot signed UEFI boot loader from an NTFS partition, and that's it. Not exactly. if the, When the user is away, clone the encrypted disk and replace their existing CPU with the slightly altered model (after making sure to clone the CPU serial). Ventoy up to 1.0.12 used the /dev/mapper/ventoy approach to boot. And of course, by the same logic, anything unsigned should not boot when Secure Boot is active. Ventoy2Disk.exe always failed to install ? The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. But . It . Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Tested on ASUS K40IN When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). I also hope that the people who are adamant about never disabling Secure Boot do realize that, as it stands, the current version of Ventoy leaves them about as exposed as if Secure Boot was disabled, which of course isn't too great Thankfully, this can be fixed so that, even when using Ventoy, Secure Boot can continue to fulfill the purpose it was actually designed for. So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" The injection is just like that I extract the ubuntu.iso and change/add some script and create an new ISO file. How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Will it boot fine? Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. Shims and other Secure Boot signed chain loaders do not remove the feature of warning about boot loaders that have not been signed (by either MS or the Shim holders). but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. First and foremost, disable legacy boot (AKA BIOS emulation). Already on GitHub? XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. Worked fine for me on my Thinkpad T420. You signed in with another tab or window. Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh Test these ISO files with Vmware firstly. So, yeah, if you have access to to the hardware, then Secure Boot, TPM or whatever security measure you currently have on consumer-grade products, is pretty much useless because, as long as you can swap hardware components around, or even touch the hardware (to glitch the RAM for instance), then unless the TPM comes with an X-Ray machine that can scan and compare hardware components, you're going to have a very hard time plugging all the many holes through which a dedicated attacker can gain access to your data. Sign in Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. Point 4 from Microsoft's official Secure Boot signing requirements states: Code submitted for UEFI signing must not be subject to GPLv3 or any license that purports to give someone the right to demand authorization keys to be able to install modified forms of the code on a device. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. So, Ventoy can also adopt that driver and support secure boot officially. You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. 1.0.84 BIOS www.ventoy.net ===> Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. This means current is MIPS64EL UEFI mode. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. It gets to the root@archiso ~ # prompt just fine using first boot option. puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. Reboot your computer and select ventoy-delete-key-1.-iso. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key. Please test and tell your opinion. If the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS, the following screen should be displayed when boot Ventoy at thte first time. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. Have a question about this project? (Haswell Processor) Tested in Memdisk and normal mode with 1.0.08b2. Then user will be clearly told that, in this case only distros whose bootloader signed with valid key can be loaded. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. It looks cool. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. boots, but kernel panic: did not find boot partitions; opens a debugger. It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. For instance, it could be that only certain models of PC have this problem with certain specific ISOs. In other words, that there might exist other software that might be used to force the door open is irrelevant. 2. . It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. Say, we disabled validation policy circumvention and Secure Boot works as it should. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: There are also third-party tools that can be used to check faulty or fake USB sticks. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? using the direct ISO download method on MS website. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. 3. I've made another patched preloader with Secure Boot support. Windows 10 32bit That's theoretically feasible but is clearly banned by the shim/MS. @ventoy Legacy? access with key cards) making sure that your safe does get installed there, so that it should give you an extra chance to detect ill intentioned people trying to access its content. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. 4. This solution is only for Legacy BIOS, not UEFI. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present my pleasure and gladly happen :) Then congratulations: You have completely removed any benefits of using Secure Boot for any person who enrolled Ventoy on their Secure Boot computer. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. Error description The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. . Sign in The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. In this quick video guide I will show you how to fix the error:No bootfile found for UEFI!Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI!I had this problem on my . When you run into problem when booting an image file, please make sure that the file is not corrupted. 3. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. its okay. So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. 4. can u test ? Well occasionally send you account related emails. Win10_1909_Chinese(Simplified)_x64.iso: Works fine, all hard drive can be properly detected. For instance, if you produce digitally signed software for Windows, to ensure that your users can validate that when they run an application, they can tell with certainty whether it comes from you or not, you really don't want someone to install software on the user computer that will suddenly make applications that weren't signed by you look as if they were signed by you. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. It only causes problems. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. It was working for hours before finally failing with a non-specific error. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00 Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. I have a solution for this. Yes. Well occasionally send you account related emails. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). Error message: But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. After installation, simply click the Start Scan button and then press on Repair All. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. privacy statement. Do I need a custom shim protocol? Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. Openbsd is based. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Some bioses have a bug. JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. Windows 11 21h2 x64 Hebrew - Successfully tested on UFEI. Download ventoy-delete-key-1..iso and copy it to the Ventoy USB drive. Use UltraISO for example and open Minitool.iso 4. The error sits 45 cm away from the screen, haha. This seem to be disabled in Ventoy's custom GRUB). 1.0.84 AA64 www.ventoy.net ===> all give ERROR on HP Laptop : Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. Some known process are as follows: You signed in with another tab or window. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. Copy the efisys.bin from C: > Windows > Boot > DVD > EFI > en-US to your desktop 3. So I think that also means Ventoy will definitely impossible to be a shim provider. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB eficompress infile outfile. No bootfile found for UEFI! When install Ventoy, maybe an option for user to choose. Must hardreset the System. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. to your account, Hi ! I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen: can u fix now ? It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI plzz help. Ventoy supports both BIOS Legacy and UEFI, however, some ISO files do not support UEFI mode. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? Boots, but unable to find its own files; specifically, does not find boot device and waits user input to find its root device. Reply. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. Already have an account? privacy statement. Yeah, I think UEFI LoadImage()/StarImage(), which is what you'd call to chain load the UEFI bootloader, are set to validate the loaded image for Secure Boot and not launch it for unsigned/broken images, if Secure Boot is enabled (but I admit I haven't formally validated that). The user could choose to run a Microsoft Windows Install ISO downloaded from the MS servers and Ventoy could inject a malicious file into it as it boots. lo importante es conocer las diferencias entre uefi y bios y tambien entre gpt y mbr. Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. Thanks a lot. Many thanks! Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. @steve6375 Okay thanks. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? Firstly, I run into the MOKManager screen and enroll the testkey-ventoy.der and reboot. I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Hiren does not have this so the tools will not work. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB